Bjarne Tveskovs Blog. Amok.


You should follow
me on Twitter


RSS Feed

Blog homepage
tveskov.com Home

Delicious links
Delicious RSS feed
FriendFeed/tveskov

Photos on 23
LEGO images on Flickr

tveskov LinkedIn
tveskov @ Google

LEGO designer
Bøger jeg har læst



internet
tveskov.com


Arkiv:
Jan10 Feb10 Mar10

Jan09 Feb09 Mar09
Apr09 Maj09 Jun09
Jul09 Aug09 Sep09
Oct09 Nov09 Dec09

Jan08 Feb08 Mar08
Apr08 Maj08 Jun08
Jul08 Aug08 Sep08
Okt08 Nov08 Dec08

Jan07 Feb07 Mar07
Apr07 Maj07 Jun07
Jul07 Aug07 Sep07
Okt07 Nov07 Dec07

Jan06 Feb06 Mar06
Apr06 Maj06 Jun06
Jul06 Aug06 Sep06
Okt06 Nov06 Dec06

Jan05 Feb05 Mar05
Apr05 Maj05 Jun05
Jul05 Aug05 Sep05
Okt05 Nov05 Dec05

Jan04 Feb04 Mar04
Apr04 Maj04 Jun04
Jul04 Aug04 Sep04
Okt04 Nov04 Dec04

Jan03 Feb03 Mar03
Apr03 Maj03 Jun03
Jul03 Aug03 Sep03
Okt03 Nov03 Dec03

          Aug02 Sep02
Okt02 Nov02 Dec02

Still proudly powered by
This page is powered by Blogger, the easy way to update your web site.
 
 

 
Ruskoff om hvorfor Murdoch har købt Wall Street Journal;

The WSJ has enough credibility to influence markets. And that’s the real game being played here. The last of the credible top-down media companies will be employed in the continuing public relations strategy for deregulation, the stock market pyramid, or whatever else is in its owners’ interests. As people learn to look at bottom-up media for the credibility that top-down conglomerate-owned media must by definition lack, things will change again. This time for the better

Og Shirky om "Cognitive surplus";

She shook her head and said, "Where do people find the time?" That was her question. And I just kind of snapped. And I said, "No one who works in TV gets to ask that question. You know where the time comes from. It comes from the cognitive surplus you've been masking for 50 years."

So how big is that surplus? So if you take Wikipedia as a kind of unit, all of Wikipedia, the whole project--every page, every edit, every talk page, every line of code, in every language that Wikipedia exists in--that represents something like the cumulation of 100 million hours of human thought. I worked this out with Martin Wattenberg at IBM; it's a back-of-the-envelope calculation, but it's the right order of magnitude, about 100 million hours of thought.

And television watching? Two hundred billion hours, in the U.S. alone, every year. Put another way, now that we have a unit, that's 2,000 Wikipedia projects a year spent watching television.


[Update. Et lille counterpoint/add-on til Shirky fra Chris Heathcote]
    0 kommentarer    

   Send en kommentar